| Anil 的个人资料~~~Plug and Pillai~~~照片日志列表 | 帮助 |
~~~Plug and Pillai~~~Life, Politics, Whatever.. 9月4日 AG's no longer the AG.So - it finally happened. Gonzales is out the door. Great riddance, smug face.
It seems like eons ago - but I wrote about this abject failure of a man and the impropriety when he became the AG. And together with his buddy Bush, he managed to destroy his office's credibility so thoroughly, his successor will have a hard time convincing anyone that water flows down and not up. I feel Gonzales has done tremendous damage to the country and the constitution - there should tough punishments for the high crimes that these so called 'public servants' commit.
Here's my entry, as I take a bow.
"An even bigger question is: isn't there a huge conflict of interest when they promoted Gonzales from Bush's counsel to the nation's number one law man? What if in the times that Bush was his client, he was part of some decisions that were clearly illegal, like oh say illegal wiretaps on US citizens? Does anyone think as the Attorney General, Gonzales is going to go back and investigate Gonzales, the counsel? "
11月4日 It finally happened..If there ever was a group of people who I thought would be steadfastedly behind Bush, it would be that cabal - the Neo Conservatives. Their idea was always to use the might of the USA to propel the wayward but oil-rich countries of the world into our way of thinking. An esteemed cause, in their eyes. Well, not anymore. The so called Architects of the Iraq War are now calling out the Engineers of the Iraq War as the worst bunch of professionals ever assembled to do anything. In the latest Vanity Fair article, there's a preview of what's to come in the January 2007 issue. It's some pretty damning stuff to the administration. Of all the rants, I found the following lines from the neocon David Frum (the Bush speech writer who crafted the infamous State of The Union Axis of Evil speech) about Mr. Bush the most damning and revealing: "I always believed as a speechwriter that if you could persuade the president to commit himself to certain words, he would feel himself committed to the ideas that underlay those words. And the big shock to me has been that although the president said the words, he just did not absorb the ideas. And that is the root of, maybe, everything." Yes, David - do you want a medal now that you finally figured that out?? Didn't you see through all the glad-handing and back-slapping that behind all the bravado and tough talk is a brain that is essentially incurious, incapable of critical thinking? Take away his ancestry, and he would have accomplished a big zero in his life. You trusted that man and his cronies with a plan to remake an ancient land, a land whose history he now probably wishes he had studied more closely? So now you have just over 2,840 American soldiers dead, and God knows how many Iraqi's dead, and the future of the Middle East hanging in balance. Bravo, neo cons! 11月3日 Kerry's no comedian for sure.Andrew Sullivan thinks so too. I agree. So Kerry botched a joke. But he didn't botch a war now, did he? 10月31日 Now you're clearly NOT my President.Traditionally, the incumbent in the White House never stepped out on a limb and called half the country traitors. I should not have been surprised when Bush ran right over that line yesterday without even stopping to appear remotely thoughtful or impartial.
"SUGAR LAND, Tex., Oct. 30 -- President Bush said terrorists will win if Democrats win and impose their policies on Iraq, as he and Vice President Cheney escalated their rhetoric Monday in an effort to turn out Republican voters in next week's midterm elections."
So now, terrorists will win, if Democrats win. In other words, over 50% of the country who want the Dems to win are working against the interests of America. In short, they are traitors.
You know, I never truly considered you as my President, what with Florida and all but I did give you the benefit of the doubt - but now, it is clear you never thought you were our President either.
10月19日 Keith Olbermann Special Comment on 10.18.2006
'Beginning of the end of America'
Olbermann addresses the Military Commissions Act in a special comment
SPECIAL COMMENT
By Keith Olbermann
Anchor, 'Countdown'
Countdown
Updated: 10:43 a.m. CT Oct 19, 2006 We have lived as if in a trance. We have lived as people in fear. And now—our rights and our freedoms in peril—we slowly awake to learn that we have been afraid of the wrong thing. Therefore, tonight have we truly become the inheritors of our American legacy. For, on this first full day that the Military Commissions Act is in force, we now face what our ancestors faced, at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering: A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it claims to protect us from. We have been here before—and we have been here before led here—by men better and wiser and nobler than George W. Bush. We have been here when President John Adams insisted that the Alien and Sedition Acts were necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use those acts to jail newspaper editors. American newspaper editors, in American jails, for things they wrote about America. We have been here when President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Espionage Act was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that Act to prosecute 2,000 Americans, especially those he disparaged as “Hyphenated Americans,” most of whom were guilty only of advocating peace in a time of war. American public speakers, in American jails, for things they said about America. And we have been here when President Franklin D. Roosevelt insisted that Executive Order 9066 was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that order to imprison and pauperize 110,000 Americans while his man in charge, General DeWitt, told Congress: “It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen—he is still a Japanese.” American citizens, in American camps, for something they neither wrote nor said nor did, but for the choices they or their ancestors had made about coming to America. Each of these actions was undertaken for the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. And each was a betrayal of that for which the president who advocated them claimed to be fighting. Adams and his party were swept from office, and the Alien and Sedition Acts erased. Many of the very people Wilson silenced survived him, and one of them even ran to succeed him, and got 900,000 votes, though his presidential campaign was conducted entirely from his jail cell. And Roosevelt’s internment of the Japanese was not merely the worst blight on his record, but it would necessitate a formal apology from the government of the United States to the citizens of the United States whose lives it ruined. The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. In times of fright, we have been only human. We have let Roosevelt’s “fear of fear itself” overtake us. We have listened to the little voice inside that has said, “the wolf is at the door; this will be temporary; this will be precise; this too shall pass.” We have accepted that the only way to stop the terrorists is to let the government become just a little bit like the terrorists. Just the way we once accepted that the only way to stop the Soviets was to let the government become just a little bit like the Soviets. Or substitute the Japanese. Or the Germans. Or the Socialists. Or the Anarchists. Or the Immigrants. Or the British. Or the Aliens. The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. And, always, always wrong. “With the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?” Wise words. And ironic ones, Mr. Bush. Your own, of course, yesterday, in signing the Military Commissions Act. You spoke so much more than you know, Sir. Sadly—of course—the distance of history will recognize that the threat this generation of Americans needed to take seriously was you. We have a long and painful history of ignoring the prophecy attributed to Benjamin Franklin that “those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” But even within this history we have not before codified the poisoning of habeas corpus, that wellspring of protection from which all essential liberties flow. You, sir, have now befouled that spring. You, sir, have now given us chaos and called it order. You, sir, have now imposed subjugation and called it freedom. For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. And — again, Mr. Bush — all of them, wrong. We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has said it is unacceptable to compare anything this country has ever done to anything the terrorists have ever done. We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has insisted again that “the United States does not torture. It’s against our laws and it’s against our values” and who has said it with a straight face while the pictures from Abu Ghraib Prison and the stories of Waterboarding figuratively fade in and out, around him. We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who may now, if he so decides, declare not merely any non-American citizens “unlawful enemy combatants” and ship them somewhere—anywhere -- but may now, if he so decides, declare you an “unlawful enemy combatant” and ship you somewhere - anywhere. And if you think this hyperbole or hysteria, ask the newspaper editors when John Adams was president or the pacifists when Woodrow Wilson was president or the Japanese at Manzanar when Franklin Roosevelt was president. And if you somehow think habeas corpus has not been suspended for American citizens but only for everybody else, ask yourself this: If you are pulled off the street tomorrow, and they call you an alien or an undocumented immigrant or an “unlawful enemy combatant”—exactly how are you going to convince them to give you a court hearing to prove you are not? Do you think this attorney general is going to help you? This President now has his blank check. He lied to get it. He lied as he received it. Is there any reason to even hope he has not lied about how he intends to use it nor who he intends to use it against? “These military commissions will provide a fair trial,” you told us yesterday, Mr. Bush, “in which the accused are presumed innocent, have access to an attorney and can hear all the evidence against them.” "Presumed innocent," Mr. Bush? The very piece of paper you signed as you said that, allows for the detainees to be abused up to the point just before they sustain “serious mental and physical trauma” in the hope of getting them to incriminate themselves, and may no longer even invoke The Geneva Conventions in their own defense. "Access to an attorney," Mr. Bush? Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift said on this program, Sir, and to the Supreme Court, that he was only granted access to his detainee defendant on the promise that the detainee would plead guilty. "Hearing all the evidence," Mr. Bush? The Military Commissions Act specifically permits the introduction of classified evidence not made available to the defense. Your words are lies, Sir. They are lies that imperil us all. “One of the terrorists believed to have planned the 9/11 attacks,” you told us yesterday, “said he hoped the attacks would be the beginning of the end of America.” That terrorist, sir, could only hope. Not his actions, nor the actions of a ceaseless line of terrorists (real or imagined), could measure up to what you have wrought. Habeas corpus? Gone. The Geneva Conventions? Optional. The moral force we shined outwards to the world as an eternal beacon, and inwards at ourselves as an eternal protection? Snuffed out. These things you have done, Mr. Bush, they would be “the beginning of the end of America.” And did it even occur to you once, sir — somewhere in amidst those eight separate, gruesome, intentional, terroristic invocations of the horrors of 9/11 -- that with only a little further shift in this world we now know—just a touch more repudiation of all of that for which our patriots died --- did it ever occur to you once that in just 27 months and two days from now when you leave office, some irresponsible future president and a “competent tribunal” of lackeys would be entitled, by the actions of your own hand, to declare the status of “unlawful enemy combatant” for -- and convene a Military Commission to try -- not John Walker Lindh, but George Walker Bush? For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. And doubtless, Sir, all of them—as always—wrong. © 2006 MSNBC Interactive
8月18日 The Resident SeerFrom CNN: "President Bush acknowledged Friday that it could take time for the people of Lebanon and the world to view the war between Israel and Hezbollah as a loss for the militant group." This coming from the guy who couldn't foresee anything - any business venture he ever did went belly-up, couldn't see the influence Bin Laden was having on the Islamic world, didn't foresee the chaos and mayhem in Iraq - never mind the WMD or lack of there of, and didn't even foresee the levees crumbling in New Orleans during a disastrous hurricane when the entire country knew they would. I am only scratching the surface here, but hey, he knows the loss was suffered by Hezbollah, and you just wait and see. Never mind the fact that Hezbollah is being raised to the level of a superhuman group by the man on the Arab street for withstanding the military might of Israel and the U.S.A. That by itself, is a huge victory for the group. Nice try, Mr. Bush. Go feed that line to some of your 30 percenters. Call it what it really is: another miserable failure of your foreign policy. If you had the foresight, you would have called for an immediate cease-fire on day 1, thereby avoiding the spectre of a re-invigorated Arab youth chanting Death to America and Israel. Not to mention the humiliation of Israel. Not every war can be won using brute strength.Thank you, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor!From The NY Times Editorial "But for now, with a careful, thoroughly grounded opinion, one judge in Michigan has done what 535 members of Congress have so abysmally failed to do. She has reasserted the rule of law over a lawless administration and shown why issues of this kind belong within the constitutional process created more than two centuries ago to handle them." Our founding fathers will be proud for someone finally standing up and saying enough is enough.
|
|
|||||
|
|